When to use a single-group or multi-group permission system? -


As far as I know there are two main styles of permissions systems out there, I would like to know that the multi-group option is actually additional Whether the problem or system load (more questions) is worth it. It seems that there is no need for more than one category with proper app design - although my app has not done enough to know me.

  • (Group / Role with Users)

Sam is a Member - He Administrator Can not reach the content. Which is an admin - can author change the post one user in a group , and the group permissions Cascade do. But he still can not access the admin content. Each user can have multiple groups , which all can show / can not do.

Why not just Sam is in the form of an intermediary and members of all the arbitrators are privileged? Besides, which works better with ACL?

Recently many work "work areas", each of which provides provision for access. can go. These work zones, eg, A, B, and C are not sequentially related, so the user may have access to A and C, but not B, or any other combination. In such a case, the heritage does not help and the user needs to assign for many roles.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

oracle - The fastest way to check if some records in a database table? -

php - multilevel menu with multilevel array -

jQuery UI: Datepicker month format -