gcc - Scope of C libraries in C++ - <X.h> vs <cX> -
C ++ programming language: Special Edition 431 on page tells that ...
However, when I & lt; Cx> Style, I do not have to qualify for the namespace. For example ... This will compile properly. Although the book says that & lt; The Cx> header defines the name only in the Steady namespace, you have permission to name those names without qualification. What am I missing here? P.S. GNU Use of GCC compiler
#include & lt; Cmath & gt; Zero F () {double var = sqrt (17); }
MSWC team member Stephen T. Lovevage addresses the reality in this post (and some refinements for the standard) in this comment on your blog posting ():
> Also,
& lt; Cstddef>
,& lt; Cstdlib & gt;
, andstd :: size_t
etc should be used!I wanted to be very careful about that. C ++ 98 had a great dream in which
& lt; Cfoo
Namespace will declare everything in the CSS, and& lt; Foo.h & gt;
and then drag everything in the global namespace with declarations (this is D5 [depr.c.headers].)in
& lt; Cfoo & gt;It was ignored by many implementers (of which There was little control over some standard standard library headers). Therefore, C ++ 0x has been changed to match reality. N2723 As a working paper, now
& lt; Cfoo & gt;
has guaranteed to declare everything within the namespace STD, and can not declare or declare things within the global namespace.& lt; Foo.h & gt; On the contrary: It is guaranteed to declare everything inside the global name space, and whether or not it can declare std under the name space.
In reality and C ++ 0x, in which
& lt; Cfoo & gt;
, everything is not safe with being declared in the global namespace. This is the reason i& lt; Cfoo & gt;
.I'm not bothered with. This library number was 456.
(C ++ 0x still rejects the headers from the standard library, which is sweltering.)
I am with Lavavej in the 100% agreement , Except that I have never tried to start using C ++ - even after & lt; Cfoo & gt;
Be very careful about using style headers - Standard C was very limited - and they never had real world problems (and apparently
Comments
Post a Comment